Biological and clinical impact of chlorhexidine on peri-implant tissues and early peri-implant healing: A combined in vitro and clinical evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38029/babcockuniv.med.j..v9i1.1363Keywords:
Chlorhexidine, Dental implants, Early osseointegration, Peri-implant tissuesAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the short-term biological and clinical effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) on peri-implant tissues using a combined in-vitro and randomised clinical approach.
Methods: An in-vitro study assessed the effects of 0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.12% CHX on cell viability and extracellular matrix (ECM) protein expression via MTT assay, immunofluorescence, and ELISA. In parallel, a clinical study randomised 40 patients receiving dental implants to either a 0.12% CHX mouthrinse group (twice daily, starting 24h post-op) or a control group (standard hygiene). Plaque index, bleeding on probing (BOP), and marginal bone levels were assessed at baseline, 1, and 3 months. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models.
Results: In vitro, 0.01% CHX showed minimal effects, while 0.05% and 0.12% caused significant, concentration-dependent cytotoxicity and suppressed collagen I and fibronectin expression (all p<0.001). Clinically, the CHX group had significantly lower plaque scores at 1 month (mean difference −0.8; p=0.001) and 3 months (−0.7; p=0.002), and reduced BOP at 3 months (−17.7%; p=0.003). Marginal bone loss did not differ between groups (−0.05 mm; p=0.46). No serious adverse events occurred.
Conclusion: Short-term postoperative 0.12% CHX use improved peri-implant plaque control and soft-tissue inflammation without short-term adverse bone effects, despite in-vitro cytotoxicity at higher concentrations. Larger, long-term trials are needed to confirm safety and efficacy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhsen MA, Sahib KM, Ali ZD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
