Efficacy of caudal epidural steroid injection for lumbar disc-related sciatica: Influence of symptom duration in a prospective study

Authors

  • Abdulwahab DM Department of Surgery, Al-Iraqia Medical School, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Faris W Department of Surgery, Al-Iraqia Medical School, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Abdul Lateef SA Department of Surgery, Al-Iraqia Medical School, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Mutasem SM Department of Surgery, Al-Iraqia Medical School, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Hamad KH Department of Surgery, Al-Iraqia Medical School, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Bohan AH Department of Surgery, Al-Iraqia Medical School, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Al Radhwany YAR Department of Surgery, Al-Iraqia Medical School, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38029/babcockuniv.med.j..v9i2.1410

Keywords:

Sciatica, Epidural Steroid Injection, Caudal Approach, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Prognosis

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injections (ESI) for sciatica from lumbar disc prolapse and determine if symptom duration affects outcomes.

Methods: 98 patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc prolapse and sciatica were recruited. They were divided by symptom duration: Group A (acute/subacute, <4 months, n=50) and Group B (chronic, >4 months, n=48). Each received one caudal injection of 80 mg triamcinolone acetonide with normal saline. Pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, one, three, and six months post-injection. Data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and independent t-tests, with significance set at p<0.05.

Results: Both groups showed significant VAS reduction at one month (Group A: 7.56±1.31 to 3.86±1.82, p=0.001; Group B: 7.52±1.41 to 4.52±2.19, p=0.001). At three months, only Group A maintained significant improvement (4.87±1.64, p<0.001 vs. baseline), while Group B’s pain returned toward baseline (5.54±1.47, p=0.08). At six months, neither group showed significant improvement from baseline. However, 24% of Group A reported ≥30% pain reduction at six months versus 6% in Group B (p=0.01).

Conclusions: Caudal ESI effectively provides short- and medium-term pain relief for sciatica from lumbar disc prolapse. Treatment within the first four months yields better and more durable outcomes. Symptom duration is a key predictor of treatment response.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Abdulwahab, D., Faris, W., Abdul Lateef, S., Mutasem, S., Hamad, K., Bohan, A., & Al Radhwany, Y. (2026). Efficacy of caudal epidural steroid injection for lumbar disc-related sciatica: Influence of symptom duration in a prospective study. Babcock University Medical Journal, 9(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.38029/babcockuniv.med.j.v9i2.1410

Issue

Section

Research Article