Efficacy of caudal epidural steroid injection for lumbar disc-related sciatica: Influence of symptom duration in a prospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38029/babcockuniv.med.j..v9i2.1410Keywords:
Sciatica, Epidural Steroid Injection, Caudal Approach, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, PrognosisAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injections (ESI) for sciatica from lumbar disc prolapse and determine if symptom duration affects outcomes.
Methods: 98 patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc prolapse and sciatica were recruited. They were divided by symptom duration: Group A (acute/subacute, <4 months, n=50) and Group B (chronic, >4 months, n=48). Each received one caudal injection of 80 mg triamcinolone acetonide with normal saline. Pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, one, three, and six months post-injection. Data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and independent t-tests, with significance set at p<0.05.
Results: Both groups showed significant VAS reduction at one month (Group A: 7.56±1.31 to 3.86±1.82, p=0.001; Group B: 7.52±1.41 to 4.52±2.19, p=0.001). At three months, only Group A maintained significant improvement (4.87±1.64, p<0.001 vs. baseline), while Group B’s pain returned toward baseline (5.54±1.47, p=0.08). At six months, neither group showed significant improvement from baseline. However, 24% of Group A reported ≥30% pain reduction at six months versus 6% in Group B (p=0.01).
Conclusions: Caudal ESI effectively provides short- and medium-term pain relief for sciatica from lumbar disc prolapse. Treatment within the first four months yields better and more durable outcomes. Symptom duration is a key predictor of treatment response.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdulwahab DM, Faris W, Abdul Lateef SA, Mutasem SM, Hamad KH, Bohan AH, Al Radhwany YAR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
